ComparisonsAlpinist CLX III vs Dura-Ace R9370 C36

ROAD DISC WHEELSETS · SIDE BY SIDE

Roval Alpinist CLX III vs Shimano Dura-Ace R9370 C36

The Roval Alpinist CLX III is 41 g lighter (1,131 g vs 1,172 g claimed per pair); the Shimano Dura-Ace R9370 C36 costs €159 less (€2,540 vs €2,699) at our October 2026 price check. The rim depth is 33 mm on the Alpinist CLX III and 36 mm on the Dura-Ace R9370 C36, the internal width is 21 mm on the Alpinist CLX III and 23 mm on the Dura-Ace R9370 C36 and the listed tyre range is 24–38 mm on the Alpinist CLX III and 28–45 mm on the Dura-Ace R9370 C36.

SEE THE DIFFERENCE

Both on the same bike.

Drag the handle to switch between the Alpinist CLX III (left) and the Dura-Ace R9370 C36 (right) on a Canyon Aeroad CF SLX 8 AXS. Black tyres shown for context.

Alpinist CLX III Dura-Ace R9370 C36

Loading bike preview…

Open this pair in the Visualizer ↗
SIDE BY SIDE

Specifications.

Rows with different values are highlighted. Weights are manufacturer claims per pair.

Roval Alpinist CLX III and Shimano Dura-Ace R9370 C36 specifications
SpecificationRoval Alpinist CLX IIIShimano Dura-Ace R9370 C36
Claimed pair weight1,131 g1,172 g
Price per pair€2,699€2,540
Price checkedOctober 2026October 2026
MSRP€3,198€2,549
Rim depth · front33 mm36 mm
Rim depth · rear33 mm36 mm
Internal width · front21 mm23 mm
Internal width · rear21 mm23 mm
External width · front26.5 mm29.4 mm
External width · rear26.5 mm29.4 mm
Listed tyre range24–38 mm28–45 mm
Rim typeHookedHooked
Spokes · front / rear21 / 24 · Carbon18 / 21 · Carbon, straight-pull, bladed (18 front / 21 rear)
BearingsCeramicCup-and-cone (ball material not stated)
WarrantyLifetime; conditions apply3 years; conditions apply
Crash replacementUp to 35% discount Conditions ↗50% discount Conditions ↗
BEYOND THE NUMBERS

What the differences mean.

General context for the specifications where these two differ. Numbers in superscript link to the sources below each topic. How much each point matters depends on your riding, tyres and bike.

Weight: what the grams mean

The Alpinist CLX III is 41 g lighter per pair (1,131 g vs 1,172 g, manufacturer claims).

On a steady climb only total weight counts: a gram in the wheels costs the same as a gram in the frame or a bottle.1 A common rule of thumb is about 2 seconds per 100 metres of climbing for every kilogram, so 150 g works out at roughly 3 seconds on a 1,000 m climb.2

Rim weight matters somewhat more when you accelerate, because the rim spins as well as moves forward; physically that effect is at most about twice that of frame weight, and only while speeding up.1 Claimed weights are measured differently from brand to brand: some include rim tape and valves, others do not, and tolerances of around ±30 g are common.3 Independent weighing usually lands close to the claim once tape and valves are accounted for.4

  1. University of Illinois physics Q&A: rotating weight
  2. Cycling Uphill: time saved per kilogram
  3. Elitewheels: what claimed weights include
  4. BikeRadar: claimed vs weighed (Shimano RS710 review)

Rim depth: aerodynamics, weight and crosswinds

Rim depth: 33 mm on the Alpinist CLX III, 36 mm on the Dura-Ace R9370 C36.

Alpinist CLX III 26.5 mm21 mm33 mm Dura-Ace R9370 C36 29.4 mm23 mm36 mm

Cross-sections drawn to scale from the catalogue values for outer width, internal width and depth; hooked rims show the bead hook. Simplified shape, not the manufacturer's exact profile.

Deeper rims generally reduce aerodynamic drag, which pays off most at higher speeds on flat or rolling roads, but they tend to weigh more and can be more affected by gusty crosswinds. In a BikeRadar comparison, 60 mm aero wheels were about a second per kilometre faster on the flat but slower on steep climbs than a considerably lighter set.1

How a wheel behaves in crosswinds depends on the rim shape as well as its depth,3 which is why TOUR measures steering torque in the wind tunnel, not just drag.2 Shallower rims are generally easier to handle in gusts, something lighter riders and riders on exposed roads tend to notice first.1

  1. BikeRadar: aero vs lightweight wheels
  2. TOUR: how wheels are tested in the lab
  3. road.cc: what wheel designers care about

Internal rim width: how the tyre sits

Internal rim width: 21 mm on the Alpinist CLX III, 23 mm on the Dura-Ace R9370 C36.

A wider internal rim spreads the tyre beads further apart, so the same tyre mounts wider and with more air volume: roughly 0.4 mm of tyre width per extra millimetre of rim width.1 A tyre labelled 28 mm can measure around 30 mm on a 21 mm rim,2 so check frame clearance against the measured width, not the printed one.4

Typical road rims have moved from about 19 mm internal width around 2020 to 21–25 mm, together with wider tyres. A wider rim also raises the narrowest tyre you may fit and, on hookless rims, comes with pressure limits.3 Brands usually shape the rim around a target tyre width for aerodynamics, so the fastest combination is not simply the widest tyre.5

  1. BicycleRollingResistance: rim width test
  2. BikeRadar: rim width explained
  3. Cyclingnews: ETRTO tyre and rim changes
  4. Silca: tyre size, pressure and aero
  5. ENVE: tyre compatibility and aero tyre widths

Listed tyre range: what it allows

Roval approves tyres from 24 mm to 38 mm for the Alpinist CLX III. Shimano recommends tyres from 28 mm to 45 mm for the Dura-Ace R9370 C36. This is a recommendation, not an approved limit.

An approved tyre range is the span of tyre widths a manufacturer permits for a rim, based on the ETRTO/ISO tables for tyre and rim combinations.2 Not every brand publishes one: some give a recommendation only, or no maximum. The lower end is the narrowest tyre that fits that internal width safely; the upper end shows how far you can go towards wider, lower-pressure tyres for comfort and grip on rough roads or gravel, provided your frame has the clearance.4

In TOUR's tests, wider tyres at a pressure matched to their width roll about as easily as narrower ones on smooth surfaces and add comfort and grip on real roads, while a tyre much wider than the rim costs some aerodynamic drag.1 Pressure calculators such as Zipp's take the rim's internal width into account as well as the tyre.3

  1. TOUR: the optimum tyre width
  2. Continental: ETRTO tyre and rim combinations
  3. Zipp: tyre pressure calculator
  4. Rene Herse: frame clearance

Spoke count

Spoke count front/rear: 21/24 on the Alpinist CLX III, 18/21 on the Dura-Ace R9370 C36.

Close-up of the Roval Alpinist CLX III hub and spokes
Alpinist CLX III 21 front / 24 rear · carbon
Close-up of the Shimano Dura-Ace R9370 C36 hub and spokes
Dura-Ace R9370 C36 18 front / 21 rear · carbon

Fewer spokes save weight and can reduce drag slightly,1 but each spoke then carries more load and a broken spoke is more likely to leave the wheel unrideable.3 Wheels with low spoke counts usually state a maximum system weight;2 compare it with your own weight plus bike and luggage rather than judging by spoke count alone.

  1. road.cc: Hunt Limitless spoke options
  2. Hunt: 5AM Limitless system weight
  3. Sheldon Brown: wheelbuilding

Ceramic or steel bearings

The Alpinist CLX III uses ceramic hub bearings, the Dura-Ace R9370 C36 steel bearings.

Ceramic hub bearings are a common premium option. CeramicSpeed quotes watt savings for upgrading hubs, bottom bracket and pulleys together.1 In independent Friction Facts tests of bottom brackets, the best steel and the best ceramic units were only hundredths of a watt apart, and seals and grease mattered more than the ball material.2

The lowest-friction setups tend to use lighter seals and grease, which protect less against rain and grit and need more frequent servicing.3 How long any bearing lasts depends mainly on seals, grease, hub design and maintenance.4

  1. CeramicSpeed: how to save watts
  2. BikeRadar: Friction Facts bottom bracket tests
  3. BikeRadar: ceramic bearings
  4. Zero Friction Cycling: hybrid ceramic vs steel

Warranty and crash replacement

Warranty: a lifetime warranty on the Alpinist CLX III, 3 years on the Dura-Ace R9370 C36; crash replacement is offered for both.

A warranty covers manufacturing defects; damage from a crash or impact is usually excluded.4 Crash replacement programmes cover that case, either free of charge or as a discount on a replacement. Hunt's H_Care is one example;2 Roval repairs or replaces crash damage free for two years on US purchases and at a discount of 20–35 % elsewhere, for up to five years.3 Some brands, Zipp among them, also include riding damage in their lifetime warranty.1

Terms differ widely: many programmes apply only to the original owner, need registration within a deadline and proof of purchase, may charge shipping or fees, and depend on the region you bought in.23 Check the current conditions on the manufacturer's page before relying on them.

  1. Zipp: warranty
  2. Hunt: warranty and crash replacement
  3. Specialized: Roval warranty and crash replacement
  4. Fulcrum: manufacturer warranty
WHICH ONE FITS

Choose by what matters to you.

Derived from the specifications above. This is not a performance rating.

Choose the Roval Alpinist CLX III if…

  • Low weight matters to you: 1,131 g, 41 g less than the Dura-Ace R9370 C36
  • You run tyres narrower than 28 mm: approved from 24 mm
  • You want ceramic bearings (the Dura-Ace R9370 C36 uses steel bearings)
Full Alpinist CLX III profile →

Choose the Shimano Dura-Ace R9370 C36 if…

  • You want to spend less: €2,540, €159 below the Alpinist CLX III
  • You plan to run tyres wider than 38 mm: recommended up to 45 mm
  • You want a wider internal rim: 23 mm against 21 mm
Full Dura-Ace R9370 C36 profile →

Common questions.

How much lighter is the Roval Alpinist CLX III than the Shimano Dura-Ace R9370 C36?

41 g. The Roval Alpinist CLX III has a claimed pair weight of 1,131 g, the Shimano Dura-Ace R9370 C36 1,172 g. Both figures are manufacturer claims.

Which has the wider tyre range?

The Shimano Dura-Ace R9370 C36. Roval approves tyres from 24 mm to 38 mm for the Alpinist CLX III. Shimano recommends tyres from 28 mm to 45 mm for the Dura-Ace R9370 C36. This is a recommendation, not an approved limit. Check the manufacturer's guidance for your exact tyre and pressure.

What is the price difference between the Roval Alpinist CLX III and the Shimano Dura-Ace R9370 C36?

€159 at our October 2026 price check: the Roval Alpinist CLX III cost €2,699 and the Shimano Dura-Ace R9370 C36 €2,540 per pair. Prices change; check the current offer with the retailer or manufacturer.

Your next step.

Roval Alpinist CLX III Check my Fit → Product profile Roval product page ↗
Shimano Dura-Ace R9370 C36 Check my Fit → Product profile Shimano product page ↗

Sources & data notes.

All values come from the Show My Bike catalogue, the same records used on the product pages. Prices checked October 2026. Some model-specific details were reviewed against the manufacturer pages. Manufacturer claims are identified as such. No independent product test is claimed, and no winner is declared.