ComparisonsSES 6.7 vs Rapide CLX III

ROAD DISC WHEELSETS · SIDE BY SIDE

ENVE SES 6.7 vs Roval Rapide CLX III

The Roval Rapide CLX III is 152 g lighter (1,305 g vs 1,457 g claimed per pair) and €350 cheaper (€2,799 vs €3,149) at our October 2026 price check. The rim depth is 60 mm front / 67 mm rear on the SES 6.7 and 51 mm front / 48 mm rear on the Rapide CLX III, the internal width is 23 mm on the SES 6.7 and 21 mm on the Rapide CLX III and the listed tyre range is 25–32 mm on the SES 6.7 and 24–38 mm on the Rapide CLX III.

SEE THE DIFFERENCE

Both on the same bike.

Drag the handle to switch between the SES 6.7 (left) and the Rapide CLX III (right) on a Canyon Aeroad CF SLX 8 AXS. Black tyres shown for context.

SES 6.7 Rapide CLX III

Loading bike preview…

Open this pair in the Visualizer ↗
SIDE BY SIDE

Specifications.

Rows with different values are highlighted. Weights are manufacturer claims per pair.

ENVE SES 6.7 and Roval Rapide CLX III specifications
SpecificationENVE SES 6.7Roval Rapide CLX III
Claimed pair weight1,457 g1,305 g
Price per pair€3,149€2,799
Price checkedOctober 2026October 2026
MSRP€3,498€3,498
Rim depth · front60 mm51 mm
Rim depth · rear67 mm48 mm
Internal width · front23 mm21 mm
Internal width · rear23 mm21 mm
External width · front30 mm35 mm
External width · rear30 mm31.3 mm
Listed tyre range25–32 mm24–38 mm
Rim typeHooklessHooked
Spokes · front / rear24 / 24 · Steel18 / 24 · Carbon
BearingsSteelCeramic
WarrantyLifetime; conditions applyLifetime; conditions apply
Crash replacementFree replacement, later 30% discount Conditions ↗Up to 35% discount Conditions ↗
BEYOND THE NUMBERS

What the differences mean.

General context for the specifications where these two differ. Numbers in superscript link to the sources below each topic. How much each point matters depends on your riding, tyres and bike.

Weight: what the grams mean

The Rapide CLX III is 152 g lighter per pair (1,305 g vs 1,457 g, manufacturer claims).

On a steady climb only total weight counts: a gram in the wheels costs the same as a gram in the frame or a bottle.1 A common rule of thumb is about 2 seconds per 100 metres of climbing for every kilogram, so 150 g works out at roughly 3 seconds on a 1,000 m climb.2

Rim weight matters somewhat more when you accelerate, because the rim spins as well as moves forward; physically that effect is at most about twice that of frame weight, and only while speeding up.1 Claimed weights are measured differently from brand to brand: some include rim tape and valves, others do not, and tolerances of around ±30 g are common.3 Independent weighing usually lands close to the claim once tape and valves are accounted for.4

  1. University of Illinois physics Q&A: rotating weight
  2. Cycling Uphill: time saved per kilogram
  3. Elitewheels: what claimed weights include
  4. BikeRadar: claimed vs weighed (Shimano RS710 review)

Rim depth: aerodynamics, weight and crosswinds

Rim depth: 60 mm front / 67 mm rear on the SES 6.7, 51 mm front / 48 mm rear on the Rapide CLX III.

SES 6.7 · front 30 mm23 mm60 mm SES 6.7 · rear 30 mm23 mm67 mm
Rapide CLX III · front 35 mm21 mm51 mm Rapide CLX III · rear 31.3 mm21 mm48 mm

Cross-sections drawn to scale from the catalogue values for outer width, internal width and depth; hooked rims show the bead hook. Simplified shape, not the manufacturer's exact profile.

Deeper rims generally reduce aerodynamic drag, which pays off most at higher speeds on flat or rolling roads, but they tend to weigh more and can be more affected by gusty crosswinds. In a BikeRadar comparison, 60 mm aero wheels were about a second per kilometre faster on the flat but slower on steep climbs than a considerably lighter set.1

How a wheel behaves in crosswinds depends on the rim shape as well as its depth,3 which is why TOUR measures steering torque in the wind tunnel, not just drag.2 Shallower rims are generally easier to handle in gusts, something lighter riders and riders on exposed roads tend to notice first.1

  1. BikeRadar: aero vs lightweight wheels
  2. TOUR: how wheels are tested in the lab
  3. road.cc: what wheel designers care about

Different rim depths front and rear

The SES 6.7 (60 mm front / 67 mm rear) and the Rapide CLX III (51 mm front / 48 mm rear) use different rim depths front and rear.

Some wheelsets use a different rim depth front and rear, and brands disagree on the direction. Roval's Rapide CLX II paired a shallower front with a deeper rear to favour stability.1 The newer Rapide III uses a slightly deeper front than rear, and Roval argues most of the aero benefit comes from the front wheel.2 Zipp's 454 NSW rim itself varies in depth along its circumference.3

Treat a split depth as a design choice of the brand rather than an advantage in itself. If crosswinds concern you, the front rim depth is the figure to look at.

  1. Gran Fondo: Roval Rapide CLX II review
  2. Cyclist: Roval Rapide III launch
  3. Zipp: 454 NSW

Internal rim width: how the tyre sits

Internal rim width: 23 mm on the SES 6.7, 21 mm on the Rapide CLX III.

A wider internal rim spreads the tyre beads further apart, so the same tyre mounts wider and with more air volume: roughly 0.4 mm of tyre width per extra millimetre of rim width.1 A tyre labelled 28 mm can measure around 30 mm on a 21 mm rim,2 so check frame clearance against the measured width, not the printed one.4

Typical road rims have moved from about 19 mm internal width around 2020 to 21–25 mm, together with wider tyres. A wider rim also raises the narrowest tyre you may fit and, on hookless rims, comes with pressure limits.3 Brands usually shape the rim around a target tyre width for aerodynamics, so the fastest combination is not simply the widest tyre.5

  1. BicycleRollingResistance: rim width test
  2. BikeRadar: rim width explained
  3. Cyclingnews: ETRTO tyre and rim changes
  4. Silca: tyre size, pressure and aero
  5. ENVE: tyre compatibility and aero tyre widths

Listed tyre range: what it allows

ENVE approves tyres from 25 mm for the SES 6.7 and publishes no maximum. The 32 mm in our catalogue is a Show My Bike assumption, not a manufacturer figure. Roval approves tyres from 24 mm to 38 mm for the Rapide CLX III.

An approved tyre range is the span of tyre widths a manufacturer permits for a rim, based on the ETRTO/ISO tables for tyre and rim combinations.2 Not every brand publishes one: some give a recommendation only, or no maximum. The lower end is the narrowest tyre that fits that internal width safely; the upper end shows how far you can go towards wider, lower-pressure tyres for comfort and grip on rough roads or gravel, provided your frame has the clearance.4

In TOUR's tests, wider tyres at a pressure matched to their width roll about as easily as narrower ones on smooth surfaces and add comfort and grip on real roads, while a tyre much wider than the rim costs some aerodynamic drag.1 Pressure calculators such as Zipp's take the rim's internal width into account as well as the tyre.3

  1. TOUR: the optimum tyre width
  2. Continental: ETRTO tyre and rim combinations
  3. Zipp: tyre pressure calculator
  4. Rene Herse: frame clearance

Hookless and hooked rims

The SES 6.7 uses a hookless rim, the Rapide CLX III a hooked rim.

SES 6.7 Hookless: straight walls
Rapide CLX III Hooked: lip grips the bead

Simplified sidewall cross-sections.

A hooked rim has a small lip on each sidewall that grips the tyre bead; a hookless rim has straight inner walls.1 Under the ETRTO/ISO standards, road tyres on hookless rims must not be inflated above 5 bar (72.5 psi),2 there are minimum tyre widths for each rim width, for example 29 mm on a 25 mm internal rim,5 and most wheel makers publish lists of approved tyres.3

Manufacturers cite precision, strength and lower weight for hookless rims; independent coverage describes the weight saving as modest. Hooked rims accept a wider choice of tyres and higher pressures.4 Both work within the standards: check the rim maker's tyre list and the pressure you like to ride before choosing tyres.

  1. Cyclist: hookless rims explained
  2. Schwalbe: hookless FAQ
  3. Zipp: hookless tyre compatibility
  4. BikeRadar: advantages of hookless rims
  5. BikeRadar: UCI hookless investigation and tyre widths

Carbon or steel spokes

The SES 6.7 uses steel spokes, the Rapide CLX III carbon spokes (24/24 vs 18/24 front/rear).

Close-up of the ENVE SES 6.7 hub and spokes
SES 6.7 24 front / 24 rear · steel
Close-up of the Roval Rapide CLX III hub and spokes
Rapide CLX III 18 front / 24 rear · carbon

A carbon spoke weighs roughly half as much as a premium steel bladed spoke,1 and brands state that carbon is stiffer for its weight.2 That is why carbon-spoke versions often use fewer spokes and weigh less: Hunt's Limitless Ti_UD uses 15/18 carbon spokes against 20/24 steel spokes on the standard Limitless.3 Some reviewers describe a more direct feel when sprinting; that is a riding impression, not a measurement.5

Steel spokes such as DT Swiss Aerolite or Sapim CX-Ray are standard parts that most workshops can source and replace.4 Carbon spokes are more sensitive to side impacts, for example from a derailleur or debris, and may need brand-specific parts or tools;1 some brands include spare spokes or crash replacement to offset this.5 Visually, the lower spoke count and slim blades give carbon-spoke wheels a lighter, more open look.

  1. BikeRadar: carbon spokes explained
  2. Hunt: UD carbon spokes explained
  3. road.cc: Hunt Limitless with carbon and steel spokes
  4. DT Swiss: Aerolite spoke
  5. Cyclist: Roval Rapide CLX III review

Ceramic or steel bearings

The Rapide CLX III uses ceramic hub bearings, the SES 6.7 steel bearings.

Ceramic hub bearings are a common premium option. CeramicSpeed quotes watt savings for upgrading hubs, bottom bracket and pulleys together.1 In independent Friction Facts tests of bottom brackets, the best steel and the best ceramic units were only hundredths of a watt apart, and seals and grease mattered more than the ball material.2

The lowest-friction setups tend to use lighter seals and grease, which protect less against rain and grit and need more frequent servicing.3 How long any bearing lasts depends mainly on seals, grease, hub design and maintenance.4

  1. CeramicSpeed: how to save watts
  2. BikeRadar: Friction Facts bottom bracket tests
  3. BikeRadar: ceramic bearings
  4. Zero Friction Cycling: hybrid ceramic vs steel
WHICH ONE FITS

Choose by what matters to you.

Derived from the specifications above. This is not a performance rating.

Choose the ENVE SES 6.7 if…

  • You prefer steel spokes (the Rapide CLX III uses carbon spokes)
  • You want the deeper rim: 60 mm front / 67 mm rear against 51 mm front / 48 mm rear
  • You want a wider internal rim: 23 mm against 21 mm
Full SES 6.7 profile →

Choose the Roval Rapide CLX III if…

  • You want to spend less: €2,799, €350 below the SES 6.7
  • Low weight matters to you: 1,305 g, 152 g less than the SES 6.7
  • You prefer carbon spokes (the SES 6.7 uses steel spokes)
Full Rapide CLX III profile →

Common questions.

How much lighter is the Roval Rapide CLX III than the ENVE SES 6.7?

152 g. The Roval Rapide CLX III has a claimed pair weight of 1,305 g, the ENVE SES 6.7 1,457 g. Both figures are manufacturer claims.

Which has the wider tyre range?

The Roval Rapide CLX III. ENVE approves tyres from 25 mm for the SES 6.7 and publishes no maximum. The 32 mm in our catalogue is a Show My Bike assumption, not a manufacturer figure. Roval approves tyres from 24 mm to 38 mm for the Rapide CLX III. Check the manufacturer's guidance for your exact tyre and pressure.

What is the price difference between the ENVE SES 6.7 and the Roval Rapide CLX III?

€350 at our October 2026 price check: the ENVE SES 6.7 cost €3,149 and the Roval Rapide CLX III €2,799 per pair. Prices change; check the current offer with the retailer or manufacturer.

Which of the two has hookless rims?

The ENVE SES 6.7 uses hookless rims, the Roval Rapide CLX III hooked rims. On hookless rims, use tyres the manufacturer approves for hookless use.

Your next step.

ENVE SES 6.7 Check my Fit → Product profile ENVE product page ↗
Roval Rapide CLX III Check my Fit → Product profile Roval product page ↗

Sources & data notes.

All values come from the Show My Bike catalogue, the same records used on the product pages. Prices checked October 2026. Some model-specific details were reviewed against the manufacturer pages. Manufacturer claims are identified as such. No independent product test is claimed, and no winner is declared.