The ENVE SES 6.7 is 43 g lighter (1,457 g vs 1,500 g claimed per pair); the Zipp 858 NSW costs €172 less (€2,977 vs €3,149) at our October 2026 price check. The rim depth is 60 mm front / 67 mm rear on the SES 6.7 and 85 mm on the 858 NSW and the listed tyre range is 25–32 mm on the SES 6.7 and 28–32 mm on the 858 NSW. Both share the internal width (23 mm).
General context for the specifications where these two differ. Numbers in superscript link to the sources below each topic. How much each point matters depends on your riding, tyres and bike.
Weight: what the grams mean
The SES 6.7 is 43 g lighter per pair (1,457 g vs 1,500 g, manufacturer claims).
SES 6.71,457 g
858 NSW1,500 g
On a steady climb only total weight counts: a gram in the wheels costs the same as a gram in the frame or a bottle.1 A common rule of thumb is about 2 seconds per 100 metres of climbing for every kilogram, so 150 g works out at roughly 3 seconds on a 1,000 m climb.2
Rim weight matters somewhat more when you accelerate, because the rim spins as well as moves forward; physically that effect is at most about twice that of frame weight, and only while speeding up.1 Claimed weights are measured differently from brand to brand: some include rim tape and valves, others do not, and tolerances of around ±30 g are common.3 Independent weighing usually lands close to the claim once tape and valves are accounted for.4
Rim depth: 60 mm front / 67 mm rear on the SES 6.7, 85 mm on the 858 NSW.
Cross-sections drawn to scale from the catalogue values for outer width, internal width and depth. Simplified shape, not the manufacturer's exact profile.
Deeper rims generally reduce aerodynamic drag, which pays off most at higher speeds on flat or rolling roads, but they tend to weigh more and can be more affected by gusty crosswinds. In a BikeRadar comparison, 60 mm aero wheels were about a second per kilometre faster on the flat but slower on steep climbs than a considerably lighter set.1
How a wheel behaves in crosswinds depends on the rim shape as well as its depth,3 which is why TOUR measures steering torque in the wind tunnel, not just drag.2 Shallower rims are generally easier to handle in gusts, something lighter riders and riders on exposed roads tend to notice first.1
The SES 6.7 (60 mm front / 67 mm rear) uses different rim depths front and rear.
Some wheelsets use a different rim depth front and rear, and brands disagree on the direction. Roval's Rapide CLX II paired a shallower front with a deeper rear to favour stability.1 The newer Rapide III uses a slightly deeper front than rear, and Roval argues most of the aero benefit comes from the front wheel.2 Zipp's 454 NSW rim itself varies in depth along its circumference.3
Treat a split depth as a design choice of the brand rather than an advantage in itself. If crosswinds concern you, the front rim depth is the figure to look at.
ENVE approves tyres from 25 mm for the SES 6.7 and publishes no maximum. The 32 mm in our catalogue is a Show My Bike assumption, not a manufacturer figure. Zipp approves tyres from 28 mm to 32 mm for the 858 NSW.
SES 6.725–32 mm
858 NSW28–32 mm
An approved tyre range is the span of tyre widths a manufacturer permits for a rim, based on the ETRTO/ISO tables for tyre and rim combinations.2 Not every brand publishes one: some give a recommendation only, or no maximum. The lower end is the narrowest tyre that fits that internal width safely; the upper end shows how far you can go towards wider, lower-pressure tyres for comfort and grip on rough roads or gravel, provided your frame has the clearance.4
In TOUR's tests, wider tyres at a pressure matched to their width roll about as easily as narrower ones on smooth surfaces and add comfort and grip on real roads, while a tyre much wider than the rim costs some aerodynamic drag.1 Pressure calculators such as Zipp's take the rim's internal width into account as well as the tyre.3
Spoke count front/rear: 24/24 on the SES 6.7, 20/20 on the 858 NSW.
SES 6.7 24 front / 24 rear · steel858 NSW 20 front / 20 rear · steel
Fewer spokes save weight and can reduce drag slightly,1 but each spoke then carries more load and a broken spoke is more likely to leave the wheel unrideable.3 Wheels with low spoke counts usually state a maximum system weight;2 compare it with your own weight plus bike and luggage rather than judging by spoke count alone.
The 858 NSW uses ceramic hub bearings, the SES 6.7 steel bearings.
Ceramic hub bearings are a common premium option. CeramicSpeed quotes watt savings for upgrading hubs, bottom bracket and pulleys together.1 In independent Friction Facts tests of bottom brackets, the best steel and the best ceramic units were only hundredths of a watt apart, and seals and grease mattered more than the ball material.2
The lowest-friction setups tend to use lighter seals and grease, which protect less against rain and grit and need more frequent servicing.3 How long any bearing lasts depends mainly on seals, grease, hub design and maintenance.4
How much lighter is the ENVE SES 6.7 than the Zipp 858 NSW?
43 g. The ENVE SES 6.7 has a claimed pair weight of 1,457 g, the Zipp 858 NSW 1,500 g. Both figures are manufacturer claims.
Which has the wider tyre range?
The ENVE SES 6.7. ENVE approves tyres from 25 mm for the SES 6.7 and publishes no maximum. The 32 mm in our catalogue is a Show My Bike assumption, not a manufacturer figure. Zipp approves tyres from 28 mm to 32 mm for the 858 NSW. Check the manufacturer's guidance for your exact tyre and pressure.
What is the price difference between the ENVE SES 6.7 and the Zipp 858 NSW?
€172 at our October 2026 price check: the ENVE SES 6.7 cost €3,149 and the Zipp 858 NSW €2,977 per pair. Prices change; check the current offer with the retailer or manufacturer.
Which of the two has hookless rims?
Both. Use tyres the manufacturer approves for hookless rims and respect the pressure limits.
All values come from the Show My Bike catalogue, the same records used on the product pages. Prices checked October 2026. Some model-specific details were reviewed against the manufacturer pages. Manufacturer claims are identified as such. No independent product test is claimed, and no winner is declared.
