ComparisonsSES 6.7 vs COSMIC SL 65

ROAD DISC WHEELSETS · SIDE BY SIDE

ENVE SES 6.7 vs Mavic COSMIC SL 65

The ENVE SES 6.7 is 223 g lighter (1,457 g vs 1,680 g claimed per pair); the Mavic COSMIC SL 65 costs €2,174 less (€975 vs €3,149) at our October 2026 price check. The rim depth is 60 mm front / 67 mm rear on the SES 6.7 and 65 mm on the COSMIC SL 65 and the listed tyre range is 25–32 mm on the SES 6.7 and 28–64 mm on the COSMIC SL 65. Both share the internal width (23 mm).

SEE THE DIFFERENCE

Both on the same bike.

Drag the handle to switch between the SES 6.7 (left) and the COSMIC SL 65 (right) on a Canyon Aeroad CF SLX 8 AXS. Black tyres shown for context.

SES 6.7 COSMIC SL 65

Loading bike preview…

Open this pair in the Visualizer ↗
SIDE BY SIDE

Specifications.

Rows with different values are highlighted. Weights are manufacturer claims per pair.

ENVE SES 6.7 and Mavic COSMIC SL 65 specifications
SpecificationENVE SES 6.7Mavic COSMIC SL 65
Claimed pair weight1,457 g1,680 g
Price per pair€3,149€975
Price checkedOctober 2026October 2026
MSRP€3,498€1,299
Rim depth · front60 mm65 mm
Rim depth · rear67 mm65 mm
Internal width · front23 mm23 mm
Internal width · rear23 mm23 mm
External width · front30 mm32 mm
External width · rear30 mm32 mm
Listed tyre range25–32 mm28–64 mm
Rim typeHooklessHooked
Spokes · front / rear24 / 24 · Steel24 / 24 · Steel
BearingsSteelSteel
WarrantyLifetime; conditions applyLifetime; conditions apply
Crash replacementFree replacement, later 30% discount Conditions ↗Up to 50% discount Conditions ↗
BEYOND THE NUMBERS

What the differences mean.

General context for the specifications where these two differ. Numbers in superscript link to the sources below each topic. How much each point matters depends on your riding, tyres and bike.

Weight: what the grams mean

The SES 6.7 is 223 g lighter per pair (1,457 g vs 1,680 g, manufacturer claims).

On a steady climb only total weight counts: a gram in the wheels costs the same as a gram in the frame or a bottle.1 A common rule of thumb is about 2 seconds per 100 metres of climbing for every kilogram, so 150 g works out at roughly 3 seconds on a 1,000 m climb.2

Rim weight matters somewhat more when you accelerate, because the rim spins as well as moves forward; physically that effect is at most about twice that of frame weight, and only while speeding up.1 Claimed weights are measured differently from brand to brand: some include rim tape and valves, others do not, and tolerances of around ±30 g are common.3 Independent weighing usually lands close to the claim once tape and valves are accounted for.4

  1. University of Illinois physics Q&A: rotating weight
  2. Cycling Uphill: time saved per kilogram
  3. Elitewheels: what claimed weights include
  4. BikeRadar: claimed vs weighed (Shimano RS710 review)

Rim depth: aerodynamics, weight and crosswinds

Rim depth: 60 mm front / 67 mm rear on the SES 6.7, 65 mm on the COSMIC SL 65.

SES 6.7 · front 30 mm23 mm60 mm SES 6.7 · rear 30 mm23 mm67 mm
COSMIC SL 65 32 mm23 mm65 mm

Cross-sections drawn to scale from the catalogue values for outer width, internal width and depth; hooked rims show the bead hook. Simplified shape, not the manufacturer's exact profile.

Deeper rims generally reduce aerodynamic drag, which pays off most at higher speeds on flat or rolling roads, but they tend to weigh more and can be more affected by gusty crosswinds. In a BikeRadar comparison, 60 mm aero wheels were about a second per kilometre faster on the flat but slower on steep climbs than a considerably lighter set.1

How a wheel behaves in crosswinds depends on the rim shape as well as its depth,3 which is why TOUR measures steering torque in the wind tunnel, not just drag.2 Shallower rims are generally easier to handle in gusts, something lighter riders and riders on exposed roads tend to notice first.1

  1. BikeRadar: aero vs lightweight wheels
  2. TOUR: how wheels are tested in the lab
  3. road.cc: what wheel designers care about

Different rim depths front and rear

The SES 6.7 (60 mm front / 67 mm rear) uses different rim depths front and rear.

Some wheelsets use a different rim depth front and rear, and brands disagree on the direction. Roval's Rapide CLX II paired a shallower front with a deeper rear to favour stability.1 The newer Rapide III uses a slightly deeper front than rear, and Roval argues most of the aero benefit comes from the front wheel.2 Zipp's 454 NSW rim itself varies in depth along its circumference.3

Treat a split depth as a design choice of the brand rather than an advantage in itself. If crosswinds concern you, the front rim depth is the figure to look at.

  1. Gran Fondo: Roval Rapide CLX II review
  2. Cyclist: Roval Rapide III launch
  3. Zipp: 454 NSW

Listed tyre range: what it allows

ENVE approves tyres from 25 mm for the SES 6.7 and publishes no maximum. The 32 mm in our catalogue is a Show My Bike assumption, not a manufacturer figure. Mavic approves tyres from 28 mm to 64 mm for the COSMIC SL 65.

An approved tyre range is the span of tyre widths a manufacturer permits for a rim, based on the ETRTO/ISO tables for tyre and rim combinations.2 Not every brand publishes one: some give a recommendation only, or no maximum. The lower end is the narrowest tyre that fits that internal width safely; the upper end shows how far you can go towards wider, lower-pressure tyres for comfort and grip on rough roads or gravel, provided your frame has the clearance.4

In TOUR's tests, wider tyres at a pressure matched to their width roll about as easily as narrower ones on smooth surfaces and add comfort and grip on real roads, while a tyre much wider than the rim costs some aerodynamic drag.1 Pressure calculators such as Zipp's take the rim's internal width into account as well as the tyre.3

  1. TOUR: the optimum tyre width
  2. Continental: ETRTO tyre and rim combinations
  3. Zipp: tyre pressure calculator
  4. Rene Herse: frame clearance

Hookless and hooked rims

The SES 6.7 uses a hookless rim, the COSMIC SL 65 a hooked rim.

SES 6.7 Hookless: straight walls
COSMIC SL 65 Hooked: lip grips the bead

Simplified sidewall cross-sections.

A hooked rim has a small lip on each sidewall that grips the tyre bead; a hookless rim has straight inner walls.1 Under the ETRTO/ISO standards, road tyres on hookless rims must not be inflated above 5 bar (72.5 psi),2 there are minimum tyre widths for each rim width, for example 29 mm on a 25 mm internal rim,5 and most wheel makers publish lists of approved tyres.3

Manufacturers cite precision, strength and lower weight for hookless rims; independent coverage describes the weight saving as modest. Hooked rims accept a wider choice of tyres and higher pressures.4 Both work within the standards: check the rim maker's tyre list and the pressure you like to ride before choosing tyres.

  1. Cyclist: hookless rims explained
  2. Schwalbe: hookless FAQ
  3. Zipp: hookless tyre compatibility
  4. BikeRadar: advantages of hookless rims
  5. BikeRadar: UCI hookless investigation and tyre widths
WHICH ONE FITS

Choose by what matters to you.

Derived from the specifications above. This is not a performance rating.

Choose the ENVE SES 6.7 if…

  • Low weight matters to you: 1,457 g, 223 g less than the COSMIC SL 65
  • You want a shallower front rim: 60 mm against 65 mm
  • You run tyres narrower than 28 mm: approved from 25 mm
Full SES 6.7 profile →

Choose the Mavic COSMIC SL 65 if…

  • You want to spend less: €975, €2,174 below the SES 6.7
  • You want a deeper front rim: 65 mm against 60 mm
  • You prefer a hooked rim (the SES 6.7 is hookless)
Full COSMIC SL 65 profile →

Common questions.

How much lighter is the ENVE SES 6.7 than the Mavic COSMIC SL 65?

223 g. The ENVE SES 6.7 has a claimed pair weight of 1,457 g, the Mavic COSMIC SL 65 1,680 g. Both figures are manufacturer claims.

Which has the wider tyre range?

The Mavic COSMIC SL 65. ENVE approves tyres from 25 mm for the SES 6.7 and publishes no maximum. The 32 mm in our catalogue is a Show My Bike assumption, not a manufacturer figure. Mavic approves tyres from 28 mm to 64 mm for the COSMIC SL 65. Check the manufacturer's guidance for your exact tyre and pressure.

What is the price difference between the ENVE SES 6.7 and the Mavic COSMIC SL 65?

€2,174 at our October 2026 price check: the ENVE SES 6.7 cost €3,149 and the Mavic COSMIC SL 65 €975 per pair. Prices change; check the current offer with the retailer or manufacturer.

Which of the two has hookless rims?

The ENVE SES 6.7 uses hookless rims, the Mavic COSMIC SL 65 hooked rims. On hookless rims, use tyres the manufacturer approves for hookless use.

Your next step.

ENVE SES 6.7 Check my Fit → Product profile ENVE product page ↗
Mavic COSMIC SL 65 Check my Fit → Product profile Mavic product page ↗

Sources & data notes.

All values come from the Show My Bike catalogue, the same records used on the product pages. Prices checked October 2026. Some model-specific details were reviewed against the manufacturer pages. Manufacturer claims are identified as such. No independent product test is claimed, and no winner is declared.